Toggle navigation McMaster 24 Hour Film Festival (2013) Load unfinished survey Resume later default Caution: JavaScript execution is disabled in your browser or for this website. You may not be able to answer all questions in this survey. Please, verify your browser parameters. McMaster 24 Hour Film Festival (2013) Well hello! This system is designed to help along the process of evaluating the films that were submitted during the McMaster 24 Hour Film Fest. There are 7 questions in this survey. Questions (This question is mandatory) Which team submitted this film? PROP: Keys DIALOGUE: "You want some more of that? I didn't think so!" - Billy Madison (1995) LOCATION: In a Chair Choose one of the following answers Please choose... AVMS - "The Rush" Crumb - "Rookie" Executive Monkey Media - "Game of Chess" Gecko Kings - "Addiction" HMPK (Hamilton McMaster Parkour) - "I Run" Ideas Through Film - "Release" Jubei Productions - "Boxcar" McTiggledot 5 - "Flux" Mobhouse Crew - "What Are You Stairing At?" OrangeMonkeyMedia - "Untitled" (LATE SUBMISSION) Pen and Rock - "Dancing with the Devil" (LATE SUBMISSION) Royals - "I Saw Something" Sarah Conrad - "TBD" SpartanSquared - "Paranormal Economy" Team Jacobs - "Reciprocity" WETDOGMEDIA - "The Spot Documentary" Other: Other: Technical Rate the following technical requirements on a scale of 1-5 (This question is mandatory) How do you feel this film scored on technical merits? Not Effective At All (hindered plot)1 2 Somewhat Effective3 4 Extremely Effective (enhanced plot)5 Video Not Effective At All (hindered plot)1 2 Somewhat Effective3 4 Extremely Effective (enhanced plot)5 Sound / Foley Not Effective At All (hindered plot)1 2 Somewhat Effective3 4 Extremely Effective (enhanced plot)5 Visual Effects Not Effective At All (hindered plot)1 2 Somewhat Effective3 4 Extremely Effective (enhanced plot)5 Editing Not Effective At All (hindered plot)1 2 Somewhat Effective3 4 Extremely Effective (enhanced plot)5 Element Integration (This question is mandatory) How effectively did this team integrate the following elements: Did not integrate the element0 Very poorly integrated (shoehorned)1 2 Integrated (little impact on plot)3 4 Very well integrated5 Prop (Keys) Did not integrate the element0 Very poorly integrated (shoehorned)1 2 Integrated (little impact on plot)3 4 Very well integrated5 Location (In a Chair) Did not integrate the element0 Very poorly integrated (shoehorned)1 2 Integrated (little impact on plot)3 4 Very well integrated5 Dialogue (You want some of that? I didn't think so) Did not integrate the element0 Very poorly integrated (shoehorned)1 2 Integrated (little impact on plot)3 4 Very well integrated5 Acting How was the acting in this film? (This question is mandatory) How effective was the overall acting in this film? Not Effective At All (distracting)1 2 Somewhat effective (believable, occasional cringe)3 4 Very Effective (good delivery, believable)5 How effective was the acting? (generally) Not Effective At All (distracting)1 2 Somewhat effective (believable, occasional cringe)3 4 Very Effective (good delivery, believable)5 Was their an Actor or Actress who absolutely stole the show? If so, which character? (use cast or general description) Feedback (This question is mandatory) Overall, was this film entertaining? (Did it achieve its goal? Will an audience like it?) Not Entertaining (I'm a little angry!)1 2 Entertaining (Ho-Hum)3 4 Very Entertaining (Nailed it!)5 Did you find this entertaining? Not Entertaining (I'm a little angry!)1 2 Entertaining (Ho-Hum)3 4 Very Entertaining (Nailed it!)5 Please provide a short comments on the film. We will share these with the participant. Something strong. Something weak. A hint to improve. Submit Load unfinished survey Resume later Please confirm you want to clear your response? Exit and clear survey ×